Senate
Bill Introduced This Week Would Allow Research Cloning
by
Ted
Agres
The Scientist
February 7, 2003; Washington, D.C. As promised, a bipartisan group of senators
has introduced legislation to ban human reproductive cloning but permit
research cloning to develop therapies. "The Human Cloning Ban and Stem
Cell Research Protection Act of 2003" (S. 303) was introduced Wednesday by
Senators Orrin Hatch (R‑Utah), Dianne Feinstein (D‑Calif), Arlen
Specter (R‑Penn), Edward M. Kennedy (D‑Mass), and Tom Harkin
(D‑Iowa).
"Let's be very clear: human reproductive
cloning is immoral and unethical. It must not be allowed under any
circumstances," Feinstein said at a news conference Wednesday. "But
at the same time, we must not prohibit nuclear transplantation research, which
holds enormous promise for millions of Americans."
The Bill, which is similar to legislation the
senators introduced last year, would make human reproductive cloning a crime
punishable by up to ten years in prison and a fine of $1 million or three times
any profits made (whichever is greater) for anyone who clones or attempts to
clone a human being. But unlike stricter anti‑cloning measures introduced
in the House and Senate last month, this Senate Bill would permit Somatic Cell
Nuclear Transfer (SCNT) techniques under strict Federal government regulations
and oversight.
The Senate Bill enjoys wide support from the
biomedical and research communities but is opposed by pro‑life
politicians, including President Bush, and a number of religious and women's‑rights
groups. However at Wednesday's hearing,
Hatch, who generally supports right‑to‑life positions, read a
letter from Nancy Reagan. The former first lady has decided to support
therapeutic cloning, Hatch said, “because of its potential to cure many
diseases, including Alzheimer's, which afflicts her husband, the former
president.” "I'm writing,
therefore, to offer my support for stem cell research and to tell you I'm in
favor of new legislation to allow the ethical use of therapeutic cloning,"
Nancy Reagan wrote. "Like you, I support a complete ban on reproductive
cloning. However, I believe that embryonic stem-cell research, under
appropriate guidelines, may provide our scientists with many answers that are
now beyond our grasp."
Prof. David Baltimore, the Nobel Prize‑winning
biologist and President of the California Institute of Technology, came to
Washington to support the legislation in person. "This is a very
appropriate Bill because it bans something that everyone considers unsafe and
it allows medical research to go forward for serious diseases," he told The Scientist. "There is a lot of
work ahead of us and what we need is support, not interference. These senators deserve
support."
The Bill includes a number of ethical and legal
regulations involving SCNT research. Among them, it mandates that eggs used in
research be unfertilized and obtained with voluntary consent; prohibits any
research on an egg cell after 14 days, when cell differentiation begins;
prohibits the purchase or sale of unfertilized eggs to prevent "embryo
farms" and requires nuclear transfer to occur in labs separate from facilities
involved in in‑vitro
fertilization.
"This bipartisan Bill sends an unequivocal
message that unsafe and irresponsible experiments to produce cloned babies will
not be tolerated," said Steven L. Teitelbaum, President of the Federation
of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB), in a statement.
"It removes political roadblocks that are impeding scientific discovery in
one of the most promising new fields of medical research while setting
appropriate ethical standards."
The Bill is "a thoughtful piece of
legislation that strikes a careful balance between banning an unsafe and
unethical application of technology while allowing critical scientific research
to continue," added Michael Werner, Vice President for Bioethics at the
Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO).
"Clearly there is a broad consensus amongst
the American public and in Congress to ban reproductive cloning," said
Michael Manganiello, President of the Coalition for the Advancement of Medical
Research (CAMR). "But those wishing to tie a ban on life‑saving
medical research, such as therapeutic cloning, together with a ban on
reproductive cloning are holding up the process and it's time to act
now."
Hatch said he decided "after much study,
reflection, and prayer, that human life requires and begins in a mother's
womb... As a Right‑to‑Life
Senator, I believe that a critical part of a pro‑life, pro‑family
philosophy is helping the living."
Last week, Sen. Sam Brownback ( R ‑ Kan)
introduced legislation (S 245) that would ban all forms of human cloning,
including SCNT for medical research. Brownback's Bill mirrored one reintroduced
in the House earlier in the month by Florida Republican Dave Weldon (HR 234).
Weldon's original Bill had passed the House in July 2001 by a wide margin;
Brownback's Bill was not brought up for consideration during the last legislative session.
Links for this article:
1. T. Agres, "Cloning Crackdown?" The Scientist (January 3, 2003); Biomedcentral.com/news .
2. E. Russo, "Cloning Steps Sideways," The Scientist (June 13, 2002); Biomedcentral.com/news.
3. E. Russo, "Clone Hearings Continue" The Scientist (January 30, 2003); biomedcentral.com/news .
4. The California Institute of Technology in Pasadena www.caltech.edu.
5. The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology faseb.org.
6. The Biotechnology Industry Organization bio.org .
7. The Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research stemcellfunding.org .